diversity
Minority Architects Rebuild Pittsburgh from
the Grassroots Up
by Zach Mortice
Associate Editor
Summary: Carnegie
Mellon’s “UDream” program helps minority students
understand a troubled community--and then gives them a chance to
fix it.
The Homewood-Brushton neighborhood of Pittsburgh.
Photo courtesy of the Carnegie Mellon School of Architecture Remaking
Cities Institute.
If the colligate academy of architecture is criticized as a designer-centered
ivory tower separate from the true-to-life state of cities and urbanism,
consider the Carnegie Mellon
School of Architecture’s Urban
Design Regional Employment Action for Minorities (UDream) program
as a rejoinder. This opportunity, run by Carnegie Mellon’s
Remaking Cities Institute, gets minority
architects working with minority communities at a grassroots level
with projects that engage the public in bringing their neighborhoods
back to life.
The Remaking Cities Institute is an urban think tank
and research center focused on urban planning. With strong relationships
with local non-profits, the institute promotes the natural evolution
of eclectic and fine-grained urbanism. In conjunction with the institute,
the UDream program has three simple goals: to increase minority participation
in architecture and urban planning, to potentially retain these talents
in Pittsburgh, and to search for urban interventions that could aid
the struggling and declining Homewood-Brushton neighborhood on Pittsburgh’s
east side.
Studying the city
UDream and the Remaking Cities Institute sponsored seven African-American
recent architecture school graduates’ participation. The program
began on June 1 and finished on Sept. 5, and was divided into two
primary components. The first four weeks were spent taking classes
at Carnegie Mellon and studying the Homewood-Brushton neighborhood.
In the classroom, the students studied sustainable design, digital
fabrication, and urban planning.
Outside of the classroom, they took
walking and boat tours of the city, familiarizing themselves with
the urbanism they would be designing in. (They also got in a trip
to Fallingwater, Frank Lloyd Wright’s
masterpiece.) At the end of this period they also worked on specific
design suggestions for Homewood-Brushton. The remainder of the summer
was spent at internships with local architecture firms and community
development non-profits. (True to UDream’s goal’s, one
firm even hired their intern full-time).
Ken Doyno, AIA, of Rothschild
Doyno Collaborative in Pittsburgh, hosted two UDream interns at his
firm. One worked on a housing project on a sloped site in the Hill
District neighborhood. The other worked with a local human services
non-profit, called the Hosanna House, on finding ways to link it
to the surrounding community. “Success
right now in the [Hosanna House] program has meant leaving the community,
so the goal was to try to develop a vision of how to have success
in the Hosanna House connect to the surrounding properties,” Doyno
says.
Past and future
The structure and content of the UDream program makes it clear that
its mission is to train architects as design-savvy community activists,
not sculptural technicians. Much of the students’ work centered
on tapping the local community’s expertise and refining it
into urban solutions. Don Carter, FAIA, director of the Remaking
Cities Institute, asks that, above all, students show respect for
existing urban contexts and cultures, facilitate the community’s
participation, and listen. “Learn from the community,” he
added, “because they’re the experts. They know what their
neighborhoods are about.”
“We often talk about what makes a piece of architecture rich,” says
Derric Heck, a UDream student. “I think one of the things that
makes it rich is when it’s representative of the people it
is intended to serve. I would like for architecture schools to emphasize
the personable nature of architecture. Of course you want people
to be technically proficient, but if that thing [you’re designing]
does not represent the people it’s going to serve, it’s
really for naught.”
In many ways, Homewood-Brushton is suffering
from a sadly typically litany of post-industrial Rust Belt urban
problems: declining populations and commercial corridors, endemic
poverty, poor municipal infrastructure, a lack of proper housing,
and blighted and abandoned lots.
The neighborhood was originally
settled in the 1880s, and was the home of ethnic white minorities
(Germans, Italians, Jews), as well as some African-Americans, making
the area one of the most diverse and integrated parts of the city.
In 1951, the Pittsburgh Redevelopment Authority revealed a plan rebuild
vast stretches of the Lower Hill District neighborhood, another African-American
area, clearing out 95 acres in total. These people were largely resettled
into Homewood-Brushton, confined to this and other adjacent neighborhood
by unfair lending practices and residential redlining.
“Fifty years later, people still feel the pain of [that relocation],” says
Heck, an architecture graduate from Florida A&M University. Many
middle class white families fled the neighborhood for suburban areas
when their new neighbors started moving in. The neighborhood further
suffered from the riots caused by the assassination of Martin Luther
King, Jr. in 1968, and the crack cocaine epidemic of the 1980s.
To
deal with these problems and legacy of urban disinvestment, the UDream
students focused on the social and economic fabric of the neighborhood
as well as its built fabric. The students looked for ways to capitalize
on the area’s existing architectural and
cultural strengths. Though dilapidated, the housing stock there is
well-built, and ripe for gentrifying investment. The neighborhood
contained the nation’s first ever African-American opera house,
the National Opera House, and it’s still home to a long-standing
African-American music community center.
The students also looked
for ways to connect Homewood-Brushton to the bus mass transit system
in the city. They also examined ways to reinvigorate the area’s
commercial core, affordable housing, and establish business incubators
and urban farms. (Like many poor neighborhoods, the nearest grocery
store is miles away.) To begin with, the UDream students wanted to
help instill a positive self-image for the neighborhood with simple,
small improvements: murals, better street lighting, new sidewalks
and pavers, landscaping, and pedestrian bridges.
Carter says the program’s focus on diversity was key in assuring
vital neighborhood buy-in. “If you’re working in minority
neighborhoods, having facilitators who are of that group in the room
makes it a lot easier to get to the point of trusting the process,” he
says. “You need people that are familiar with the culture and
can understand where the community is coming from. It’s not
that every other professional can’t work that way and do the
work. In fact, that’s the way it’s gone for the most
part. It does add to the richness of the process to have that mosaic
of people.”
If architecture and urban planning had been more
diverse and inclusive when these heavy-handed urban redevelopment
decisions that have scarred neighborhoods and caused this lack of
trust between people and planners were made, they would likely have
been avoided, Carter says. The problem, he says, lied both in the
lack of diversity and community perspective around design and planning
studio tables, as well as with the decision making process itself,
which was purely top-down, with little call (or tolerance) for public
participation.
“Community organizer”
During the summer internship portion of the UDream program, Heck
found himself working to put a new face on the Pittsburgh Redevelopment
Authority for the Homewood-Brushton community decades after the agency
irreparably changed their neighborhood and relationship to the city.
Heck succinctly describes his role with the redevelopment agency
as a “community organizer.” He was responsible for putting
together a neighborhood steering committee that would select architects
for Homewood-Brushton projects. His primary goal was to identify
people to sit on the committee, but he also worked on programming,
development, and research projects—essentially training people
to become stakeholders and advocates for their own neighborhoods.
Along the way, Heck discovered that design solutions reside just
as often with the people architects serve as they do with designers’ own
skills. “Working with this group of individuals just showed
that research can come from technical experts, and it can come from
children,” he says.
“The community was very open and accepting of [the UDream students,]” Carter
says, “and very proud of them, because the community didn’t
normally see seven African-American architects coming in to work
in a neighborhood.” |