|
by Connie S. McFarland,
FAIA, FACHA
Near the close of 2005, the AIA Risk Management Committee,
American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), and the Professional
Engineers in Private Practice Professional Liability Committee of the
National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE/PEPP) sent their annual
Professional Liability Insurance Survey to a number of the largest insurance
carriers currently offering professional liability coverage for architects
and engineers in the United States. Thirteen companies responded to the
survey; 11 agreed to be interviewed.
A summary of survey results can be found in the Risk
Management page on AIA.org, where you will find each company’s responses on:
- General information related to the company’s address and contact
individuals
- The company’s relationship to the primary insurer carrier
(if the responding company was not itself the insurer)
- A list of primary
carriers that the company represents
- The length of time that the company
has been providing professional liability coverage to the A&E
market
- The
company’s total book of business in the A&E professional
liability insurance market
- Its goals for either increasing, decreasing,
or maintaining market share in the next two years
- The carrier’s
A.M. Best Rating and financial category
- The company’s combined ratio
for 2003, which is used to determine the company’s profits or losses
in underwriting A&E insurance
- Any underwriting restrictions based
on things such as an A&E firm’s
size or type of practice (including whether the company offers multi-year
policies)
- What limits of liability are available through the company
- Any special
provisions for new insureds (such as coverage for prior acts)
- Whether
the company seeks feedback from user groups or professional societies
before making policy or rate changes
- A list of states where the carrier
offers coverage on an admitted basis or a surplus basis, or where
it doesn’t offer coverage at
all
- Any limits on deductibles
- Minimum premiums for specified amounts of coverage
- Percentages of increases
or decreases in the carrier’s rates
over the past three years
- Expected changes in rates in 2006 and 2007
- Whether the carrier offers
any type of profit sharing or dividend return to its A&E policy
holders
- The
company’s ranking of the characteristics that determine
premiums
- Whether the carrier offers project insurance
- How the company defines
and handles claims
- Litigation and settlement practices.
Of the 13 insurance companies that responded to the survey, the 11 who
agreed to interviews with AIA, NSPE, and ACEC representatives provided
further clarification. Interviewees were:
- Arrowhead Design Insurance
- AVRECO
- Beazley Insurance Co., a syndicate at Lloyd’s of London
- Insight
Insurance Services, for Everest National Insurance Company
- Lexington Insurance
Company
- RA&MCO Insurance Services, for HCC Insurance Holdings
- St. Paul Travelers
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
- Victor O. Schinnerer & Company,
for Continental Casualty Co. (CNA Insurance)
- XL Design Professional
- Zurich.
The AIA, NSPE, and ACEC also appreciate the survey responses from ACE
USA and Euclid. Because of time limitations, the design-society representatives
were unable to interview them this year.
Selected comments and observations by insurance-company
representatives
- In contrast to the significant rate increases
that characterized the early years of this decade, most of the
insurance companies interviewed in late 2005 expect rates to remain
fairly stable in 2006.
- Several insurance companies reported that they have excess capacity
and are aggressively looking to write new policies.
- Although there are some variations among the companies, the majority
seem to have seen some stabilization in the frequency and severity
of claims.
- A number of insurance companies are currently interested in writing
professional liability insurance for architects and engineers, although
these companies continue to shift, merge, and realign.
- Over the last few years, a number of professional liability insurance
companies have filed mold exclusions with state insurance commissions
in the event that they might choose to make them a part of their
policies in the future. The majority of the insurance interviewees
stated that they have not experienced the level of claims that would
necessitate their actually activating that exclusion in their policies.
- Many of the insurance companies interviewed did express concern
over the amount of claims resulting from condominium projects, as
well as residential projects in general. Several companies reported
that they exercise strict underwriting guidelines for architects and
engineers whose practices include a significant amount of condominium
work or other residential projects.
- Almost all of the insurance companies reported that they will
write no (or only limited) project-specific policies, but several
companies stated that they do still write surplus coverage for specific
projects for existing policyholders.
- Almost all of the insurance companies reported that they encourage “incident
reporting.” They also encourage policyholders to use their insurers’ contract-review
services as well as any pre-claim assistance that their insurer is
willing to offer.
In trends similar to those the AIA Risk Management Committee reported
in its 2004 survey, the rate increases in recent years coupled with the
expansion in the number of insurance companies offering professional
liability insurance coverage to design professionals seems to have created
a competitive and aggressive market. Depending on the size of the firm,
your claims history, and your tolerance for risk, there are a number
of options to consider. In good markets or bad, an experienced broker
who specializes in professional liability insurance for design professionals
remains your best resource, no matter whether you are in the process
of buying your first policy or renewing your existing policy
Copyright 2006 The American Institute of Architects.
All rights reserved. Home Page
|
|
|
For more information
on the Risk Management Committee or on risk management generally, visit
the AIA Risk Management Resource Center.
Connie S. McFarland, FAIA, FACHA, is a principal at McFarland Davies
Architects in Tulsa, Okla., and is a member of the AIA Risk Management
Committee.
|
|