06/2005 |
Design as Leadership Device | |||||||||||
by Stephen Kliment, FAIA, reprinted from the IOMA Principal’s Report Architects’ past track record of leadership is what prompted Richard Swett, FAIA, to write with Colleen Thornton Leadership by Design: Creating an Architecture of Trust, a book that helps architects and engineers gain a stronger voice in public policy. A/Es must learn to apply the elements of the design process they learned in school and during daily business practice to the challenges of leadership, says Swett. Otherwise, they risk being overlooked at the decision making that shapes public policy at all levels of government. Swett began his professional life as an architect, served two terms as a U.S. congressman from New Hampshire (1991–1995), and later became the U.S. ambassador to Denmark. He has since returned to architecture. As the only architect to serve in Congress during the 20th century, and as one of the few architects to represent the U.S. overseas since Thomas Jefferson served in France (1785–1789), Swett has an understanding of how A/Es can attain leadership roles. How the design process begets leadership. The design process involves these steps: Define a problem and identify and explore the means available to solve it; determine and document alternative solutions; and select the solution that best meets the constraints of time, funding, and quality. A good leader:
Getting it to work for you. “Identify issues or projects that can be acted upon in tangible ways within the sphere of your daily life,” Swett urges. “Don’t be cramped by the superfluous activities and distractions that . . . impinge on your time. Rather, [rank] those things that are most important to you.” Lastly, he says, “define for yourself the boundaries of the community you wish to serve.” Swett chides A/Es for having “Slowly surrendered their position as the executives of the building process,” leading to where “the status of the architect changed from the leader of the building team to just the designer on a team of building experts.” He cites business leader Robert Greenleaf’s 10 traits of so-called servant leaders, which create a rather irresolute public perception of a firm’s leadership. Beyond the building team. Swett’s vision for design professionals as leaders goes beyond leading the building team. For a selection of individuals Swett believes exemplify strong leadership, power, and accomplishment, he offers 10 examples of architects who led: Georg Carstensen (1812–1857), Frederick Law Olmsted (1822–1903), Richard Morris Hunt (1827–1895), Frank Furness (1839–1912), William LeBaron Jenney (1832–1907), Detlef Lienau (1832–1907), Alfred Tredway White (1846–1921), William J. Fryer Jr. (1842–1907), Florence Hope Luscomb (1887–1985), and Harvey Gantt (1943–). The Union League Club, founded in 1863, is one example of a leadership center where architects and engineers joined with other professionals to deal with national and local social and political issues. It was “surely one of the most successful [organizations] mobilizing and directing with extraordinary speed many of the most influential, highly talented men and women of its generation,” says Swett. The club served as “a powerful civic, political, and cultural machine,” achieving for its members an influence far beyond their own vocation, and repositioning “the architectural profession . . . freeing it from the narrow confines of art history’s specialized context and bringing it into the broader plane of American civil and political life.” Learning the political process. Using as a model the successful launching of the first New York City building code, Swett spells out five basic political principles for A/Es who aspire to leadership:
Leadership and 9/11. Strong leadership would have helped A/Es who were involved in designing the Freedom Tower at Ground Zero in Lower Manhattan. Swett believes they should have concentrated on integrating physical design, political and economic reality, and cultural and civic ideals, instead of focusing on elaborate physical design presentations to win a stronger leadership position. Swett faults the profession for “failing to comprehend” this difficult task and for not summoning “the creative wisdom necessary to generate adequate solutions.” Conclusion. “In a time when it seems that unbridled selfishness and narcissism run amok in contemporary society, the good leader should not be a superstar but rather a star citizen who speaks truth to power,” argues Swett. “Most important, the leader should . . . accept the consequences of his or her actions.” Leadership by Design is a rare look at the politics of leadership and highlights the elements of an A/E’s training that are natural tools for success. It chronicles the design profession in the U.S. through the actions of the few who achieved leadership beyond their own vocation. copyright 2005 The Institute of Management & Administration, Inc. Copyright 2005 The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Home Page |
|
|||||||||||