|
by Kermit Baker,
PhD, Hon. AIA
Chief Economist
The
upsurge in design activity that began around the beginning of the year
continued in April. Almost 29 percent of firms reported increased billings
in April, while only 9 percent reported declines. Particularly encouraging
is that the strong business conditions are broad-based across the profession.
Both larger and smaller firms indicate solid conditions. Firms
in all regions of the country—and of all building type specializations—report
improving conditions.
Furthermore, there is no evidence of a slowdown
in the reported project inquiries. Over 40 percent of firms indicate
that inquiries increased during April, while fewer than 10 percent reported
a decline as compared to March levels. As with billings levels, the
increase in inquiries was broad-based. Reporting particularly sharp increases
in inquiries were firms located in the South, and firms specializing
in the residential and commercial/industrial sectors.
While architecture
firms have gotten off to a strong start this year, the broader economy
has not matched this performance. The economy grew at a 3.1 percent
pace during the first quarter, well below the 4.4 percent growth in 2004,
and the weakest quarter for our economy since the first quarter of
2003. Slower growth in investment spending by businesses on structures
and equipment was a major cause for slower growth, and business investment
in structures even declined during the quarter.
There is some hope that the second quarter will
show a rebound in our economy. Oil prices have stabilized recently, even
though they remain at very high levels, and businesses have picked up
their pace of adding new workers. April saw an increase in payrolls of
274,000 nationally, well above the 190,000 added per month on average
during the first quarter. Construction accounted for almost 20 percent
of the payroll gains in April, with its best month in terms of job growth
since March 2004.
Continuing
compensation concern
After increasing well in excess of the rate of inflation though the mid-to-late
1990s, architect compensation slowed a bit during the nonresidential
construction downturn earlier this decade. However, a major study by
the AIA on compensation trends in the profession that will be released
next month indicates that compensation has begun to pick up.
Still, compensation
remains a hot-button issue for the profession. This month’s survey
asked members of the AIA Work-on-the-Boards panel to comment on compensation
concerns. Four in 10 respondents felt that compensation is a major
problem for those considering entering the architecture profession.
Almost half (47 percent) felt that compensation is a major problem
for those currently in the profession.
The agreement on the pervasiveness
of the problem, however, doesn’t
translate into a consensus on the experience level for architecture staff
where compensation concerns are the greatest. More than 30 percent of
respondents felt that the problem was most serious for entry-level
architecture staff (0–4 years). More than 40 percent felt that
the greatest concern was for mid-level staff (5–10 years). Almost
30 percent felt that compensation of senior staff (more than 10 years
of experience) presented the greatest concern.
Copyright 2005 The American Institute of Architects.
All rights reserved. Home Page
|
|
|
|
This
month, Work-on-the-Boards survey participants are saying:
• Demand for services is too great for the
available workforce to satisfy.
—13-person firm in the Northeast,
mixed specialization
• It’s getting better. Firms are looking for help;
that is a good sign.
—11-person firm in the West,
commercial/industrial specialization
• We’re having trouble finding qualified employees.
—21-person firm in the South,
commercial/industrial specialization
• There is great uncertainty. Clients are watching oil/gas
prices and interest rates very closely. We are adjusting our expectations
on hiring for the summer.
—18-person firm in the Midwest,
commercial/industrial specialization.
|
|
|
|
|
|