by
Eugene C. Hopkins, FAIA
Like a number of the AIA’s larger components, AIA/DC publishes
a magazine. And, like all of these publications, Architecture
DC provides a forum or chat room where the community’s appetite
for design and the architect’s imagination intersect. At a time
when good news does not often make the headlines, these publications offer
an inspirational message written in language refreshingly free of jargon
that engages the public. It’s a message that begs to be heard.
Take, for example, the spring issue of Architecture
DC devoted to “Architecture Ahead.” The editor identifies
21 projects on the boards that are re-imagining some aspect of the face
of our nation’s capital. Each of the 21 stories contained between
the magazine’s covers is illustrated with a photo of the site as
it is today and what it will look like on some not-too-distant tomorrow.
These
are not imaginary designs. They are not flights of “what if.”
They are works in various stages of being fully realized. With few exceptions—and
these only for the right reasons—the individual projects are not
attention-grabbing, one-of-a-kind designs. Instead, thanks to the vision
of enlightened clients, these projects fill an empty lot here, restore
a neglected building there, reuse for new purposes a familiar landmark,
or remedy a longstanding urban design problem. Collectively, they add
up to a hopeful exercise in place making that is bringing jobs, urban
amenities, and new life to Washington.
This in a city still suffering from poor schools, random violence, AIDS,
corruption, and poverty—all of which are graphically broadcast on
the local nightly news. Architecture
DC interrupts the litany of despair. Instead, the spring issue
strongly suggests that today’s snapshots of decay and hopelessness
do not have to be tomorrow’s news. There is a healing force powerfully
at work, a force that is informed and in some cases led by architects
in creative partnership with concerned community leaders.
- Are our schools run-down and ill-equipped to respond to changing community
needs? New schools and revitalized older ones are being designed to
be anchors of neighborhoods.
- Are our downtowns bereft of life once the sun goes down? Architects
are recycling old and designing new buildings that bring back housing
to the urban core while at the same time designing the infrastructure
of services—from theaters and galleries to restaurants and supermarkets—that
sustain the growing number of urban homesteaders.
- Has the city’s traditional role as an economic powerhouse been
irrevocably lost to the suburbs? New projects are sparking investment
in long-neglected neighborhoods.
- Is the pollution and congestion of the morning commute an unalterable
fact of modern life? Architects are working with government to design
projects integrated with modern high-speed and low-polluting mass transit.
- Is part of the future of America’s older cities to become centers
for the arts? Architects are leading the way by designing innovative
facilities to accommodate the human spirit’s capacity for wonder.
- Are the poor being squeezed out by gentrification? Working with government
officials, neighborhood leaders, and enlightened public agencies, architects
are designing quality affordable housing that preserves the diversity
essential to fulfill the historic role of great cities as engines of
social and economic opportunity.
It’s been said the world is divided into dreamers and doers. If
so, I would have to say that the truly wonderful thing about our profession—perhaps
the source of its attraction to architects and the public alike—is
the fact that we get to do both.
Something else. What separates us, as dreamers and doers, from the naysayers
is a quality of character that won’t let us be content with or make
excuses for an imperfect status quo. That, finally, is the implicit message
underlying all the hope-inspiring projects showcased in the spring issue
of Architecture DC. Or, as George
Bernard Shaw put it: “You see things; and you say Why? But I dream
things that never were; and I say Why not?”
Copyright 2004 The American Institute of Architects.
All rights reserved. Home Page
|