Early last month, I awoke with great anticipation,
eager to review the final results of my home state of California's primary
elections. Although I am not a politics junkie, I have lately taken to
casting a watchful eye on where American social values seem to be moving
based in part on the voters' mandate.
In the 2000 Presidential election, I counted 52
local and state ballot propositions on quality-of-life issuesschool
bonds, library bonds, clean air and water measures, affordable housing,
land-use controls, and alternative transit proposals, to name a few. In
the recent "off-year" election, two out of the four state propositions
dealt with quality-of-life issues: One funding neighborhood parks passed
by 57 percent; another using gas tax revenues to pay for transportation
improvements passed by 69 percent. Additionally, the successful Republican
challenger for the Governor's seat identified quality of life as one of
his three primary concerns.
What's going on? Is California marching to a different
drummer from the rest of America? I don't think so. Similar election results
across the country over the past three years reinforce the findings of
pollsters such as J. Walker Smith of the Yankelovich Group. Consumer-preference
polling experts like Smith are discovering that more than ever the public
seeks "intimacy, connectivity, and increased opportunities of nesting,"
and, in so doing, are building community and demanding a higher quality
of life. Perhaps most significantly, the public is willing to pay for
this higher quality of life through taxation. Smith points to the proliferation
of life style magazines as further evidence of the public's interest in
quality of life issues.
As I think about addressing these issues, designboth
in policy and physical implementationleaps to the forefront. Phrases
we have all useddesign matters,
good design is good business, design represents a value propositionfinally
are finding broader acceptance and a public voice. This is great news
for our profession, because design is
our core competence. This claim cannot be made by attorneys or
venture capitalist or MBAs or dot-com whiz kids or technologists or surgeons
or scientists. The interdisciplinary, integrative, and visionary dimensions
of the design process are what we bring to the table. It is what makes
our profession of increasing value to individuals and entire communities
that want a better life for themselves and their children.
Design on the threshold?
In his book The Tipping Point,
Malcolm Gladwell defines the tipping point as a threshold, a boiling point,
or a moment of critical mass. Ideas transformed into products that reached
a tipping point are the fax machine, cell phone, and, of course, the personal
computer. Gladwell spells out what he sees to be the three characteristics
of ideas that reach tipping points:
1) They are contagiousthey spread like epidemics
or viruses
2) They are leveragedlittle causes create large impacts
3) Initially change occurs gradually but then speeds up rapidly as it
approaches a tipping point.
Could both the prestige and impact of the design
process be at a tipping point? Are we at a point similar to the impact
science and technology had in ushering in the Industrial Revolution as
well as our more recent Information age?
Design indeed may be reaching that critical mass.
But it's not a sure thing. Important questions remain:
Can we define design in a manner that is more expansive without
being so broad as to be meaningless?
What expanded services, roles, and responsibilities would architects
assume as more and more issues are approached as design problems?
Would the public find architects credible and valuable in these
roles?
Do we have the right education and skills to provide these new
services?
These questions demand careful exploration and debate.
AIA convention explores
architecture's tipping point
Design Design, the theme of this
year's AIA national convention in Charlotte, May 9 to 11, offers a platform
for such mind-expanding explorations, which will be launched by three
dynamic keynote speakers. Starting on Thursday with management futurist
Tom Peters, we'll explore the concept of how and when design matters.
On Friday, Hugh McCollformer CEO and President of Nations Bank/Bank
of America, credited with building much of Charlottewill lead us
in an examination of the role of architecture as a value-added proposition.
Come Saturday Nissan's Creative Director Jerry Hirshberg will be the moderator
of a panel of AIA Gold Medalists who will explore the wide-ranging power
of architecture to bridge people, process, and place.
I believe we are at a unique point in our history
as a profession: Seldom if ever have America's architects had such an
opportunity to engage the public through the power of design. Seldom if
ever have we been in a stronger position to create not only better architecture,
but also a better profession. Come to Charlotte to explore the tipping
point of design and expand your own thinking about your preferred future
in architecture.
Copyright 2002 The American Institute of Architects.
All rights reserved.
|