|
I first heard it from a corporate architectan
owner's rep: "To me, an architect is just another vendor and architecture
is like any other commodity."
I've berated myself ever since for not being quick
enough: "And do you pay extra for firmness
and delight?" Beyond that, his remark still rankles, not only
with me, but with others I ask. There seems a market trend towardor
at least a lot of talk aboutcommodification of most everything,
and architects resent their services being lumped in with it all. It's
like alleging we have complicity in some immoderate, ongoing (and worse,
unnecessary and un-green) 1980s-type consumerist binge.
Interchangeability?
Commodities are generally understood to be trade goods having certain
assumed characteristics and typically being interchangeable within their
categories. One pork future is very like any otherexcept for price,
the pork itself is all government-inspected, as is most everything. By
market demand, industry standards, and regulatory law, commodities of
each specific category (automobile tires, pine 2x4s, aspirin, whatever)
meet applicable quality standards within a reasonable range.
If architecture is a specific category of commodity,
then by implication, within an acceptable range of quality, any AutoCAD
14 drawing is expected to be equal to any other. If that's the case, it's
only logical to buy what's legal and cheapest, so let's have architects
compete only on price. Or in management guru Tom Peters' jargon, "For
survival . . . you'll have to be ultra-fast, error-free, and dirt-cheap."
And, as if that's not enough, add the fact that virtually all commodities
are tangible and quantifiable consumables that can be used up (gas gets
burned, peanuts eaten, etc.).
It's enough to fairly make one bristle with righteous
pontifications about ineffable qualities of timeless design as intangibles
that keep giving value throughout the life cycle of the structure and
what about the value of architecture-as-art, we say! All that in one breath.
Formal branding
Which brings up a totally different take on how design services get treated
as commodities. When a Frank Gehry, Rem Koolhaus, or Daniel Libeskind
wins a commission, you really can't predict the formal statement of the
subsequent design, but you can
anticipate that it will comprise the next notable piece of the body of
work of that particular designer. And recognizably so as a matter of visual,
formal branding. Hence the term
"signature designer," meaning the purveyor of an extremely upscale
commodity, offering the client a definite one-upsmanship value. "Oh
yeah, we went all the way and bought a 'Zaha Hadid' for this one!"
So we have architecture-as-commodity polar subcategoriesModular
housing at one end and high art at the other. Between these two extremes
there labors the vast majority of architects who are on the one hand unwilling
to provide, or on the other incapable of committing, "architecture
as commodity."
Prescription: generic?
What might be the antidote to this pernicious pressure toward strip-commercial
sameness, with Consumer Reports looming as arbiters of the best buy? Maybe
we can look to our medical colleagues for the answer. I'm no avid reader
of AMA Journals, but I've yet
to hear righteously indignant outcries from doctors about the commodification
of medicine via the way of HMO or "Doc-in-the-Box" emergency
clinics. Having used both, I actually find those practitioners are very
professional. They take me and my problems sufficiently seriously, seem
to put themselves in my place and behave with genuine care for my well-being,
and make only those decisions that they believe to be in my best interest.
It's an agency relationship. We have one of those too, and without fervently
using it, we well might turn out to be vendors after all.
When my HMO says to, I may settle for buying a generic
prescription. I won't settle for being one.
Jim Franklin, 1999 Kemper Award winner, is
a lecturer in the architecture department, at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo.
Copyright 2001 The American Institute of Architects.
All rights reserved.
|
|
|