|
Wrapping up the first day's theme panel at the AIA
convention in Denver, 1999 AIA President Michael Stanton answered no to
the session's title question, "American Cities and Suburbs: Big Trouble
Ahead?" There are big issues ahead, not big troubles, said Stanton,
who moderated the hour-and-a-half session.
Panelists included Dominique Acevedo, a development
director with the Northeast Denver Housing Center; Denver Council Member
Susan Barnes-Gelt; and AIA Board Public Director and former Louisville
Mayor Jerry Abramson.
Stanton set the tone for the panel by broadening
the perspective. The U.S. is unique in the world by having such an enormous
diversity of city sizes, types, and densities, he said. Each category
of city presents its own set of challenges and opportunities. Because
the discussion was about the relationship between city and suburb, he
focussed on the similarities of cities that came into prominence before
the automobile age and those that came after.
Design in Denver
Acevedo described an affordable-housing competition for Denver's oldest
suburb sponsored in part by the AIA Young Architects PIA. A neighborhood
that first came to be in the 1860s with the advent of a commuter rail,
Five Points has gone through several cycles of population migration. The
latest has left the area underpopulated. Now, with a light rail connection
promising to bring life back to the neighborhood, the Northeast Denver
Housing Center is faced with the possibility of widespread increases in
housing prices that could again cause a wrenching turnover of population.
The solution they are working toward now is to develop 550 units of mixed-income
housing. Turning an aging suburb around means creating housing for all
income levels, she said.
Denver's gift and its challenge is that people love
it for the mountains, Barnes-Gilt said. People in the Denver area have
ignored the built environment because they see it as temporal space. Civic
buildings are designed with the same 40-year life expectancy as commercial
buildings. The design strength in Denver is in the quality of its neighborhoods,
she added. And that comes from the street and lot grid that creates a
sense of community. Old urbanism, now called new urbanism, works, she
said.
In Denver now, the threat to these neighborhoods
is in the Balkanization of the thousands of jurisdictions of which it
is composed. Sales tax, not property tax, is the primary source of civic
income. Thus, each jurisdiction chases commercial development rather than
neighborhood planning, even if that means big-box commercial development
that destroys an adjacent jurisdiction. The solution is regionalism, Barnes-Gilt
said, with residential and commercial cores connected by regional transit
systems. A barrier is that the public is ahead of politicians on this
idea. People want regionalism, she said. Politicians too often tend to
want parochialism. When we talk of smart growth, she concluded, the D
word isn't density, it's design.
Abramson to architects:
Get involved!
Abramson charged up the audience with a list of trends. One that is developing
in Louisville is a recent referendum to merge the city and county governments,
bringing the city and suburbs together under one council. Suburbs have
long resisted this connection, he said. But certain trends show that the
attention of once-complacent suburbanites' is moving back to the core
cities:
Development-savvy suburban dwellers are fighting to keep undeveloped
land that way. Conservation trusts are buying land and governments are
buying easements against development of farmlands, all to keep the domino
effect of rural land falling to poorly planned development.
Old suburbs face the same problems of decline as the cities they
surround, with development moving outward. But people are tired of long
commutes and high gas prices. Transportation is becoming a huge issue.
People are moving back in or expanding transit systems.
Education is a major issue because poor schools mean lost taxpayers.
Design matters to the public at large.
New urbanism works because it creates interaction with neighbors.
Environmental issues are important to the public at large.
Recreation spaces, with well-designed amenities and facilities
are increasingly popular.
Out-of-home care is another major need, an audience member pointed
out.
All this is creating opportunity for architects,
Abramson said. The way for architects to get meaningfully involved is
to get civically involved. When politicians face a tough, nitty-gritty
problem, they round up the usual suspects to help them out of it, he said.
Architects aren't the first that come to mind. And they should be. Become
players and get perceived as problem solvers, Abramson exhorted to the
packed and, their applause implied, appreciative audience.
Copyright 2001 The American Institute of Architects.
All rights reserved.
|
|
Reference |
|
|
Shown left
to right are Susan Barnes-Gelt, Dominique Acevedo, Michael Stanton,
FAIA, and Jerry Abramson. |
|
|
|
|