Inflation
Here’s one reason the Federal
Reserve keeps raising rates:
Inflation is actually greater than official reports indicate. Because of
the methodology used, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is understated by
as much as half a percentage point. Prices in May, for example, actually
climbed about 3.3% on an annualized basis instead of the rather tame 2.8%
indicated by the CPI. And, in 2005, inflation will run roughly 3.5%, not
the 3% we forecast for the CPI.
Blame it on housing costs. Since 1983, official CPI numbers have been
based in part on “owner-equivalent rent” ... the amount a
home would fetch in rent ... as a substitute for homeowners’ lodging
costs. That method worked until house prices began to soar and rents
sank, leaving a gap that distorted measurements. The problem is temporary.
By mid-2006, that gap is likely to narrow as gains in home prices ease
and the rental market gets hotter. That’ll make the whole issue
moot.
The economy
A tighter labor market is shaping up. The unemployment rate fell to 5%
last month, the lowest level since Sept. 2001. Meanwhile, the economy
added 146,000 jobs in June, a healthy gain.
The faster pace of hiring will push
up wages as workers feel more confident
to look around for new jobs. Average hourly earnings have increased 2.7%
over the past year and are a good bet to continue inching upward.
Rising wages bode well for economic
growth by helping to fuel spending
by consumers. But they also add to inflation pressures.
The rush to refinance shows no sign
of slowing. People who missed the
2003 refinancing wave are moving to take advantage of today’s rates
... an average 5.6% on a 30-year fixed mortgage, down from 6.2% a year
ago.
That’s more good news for the economy. Monthly mortgage savings
plus the extra cash from refinancings let homeowners spend even more.
Congress won’t be too hard on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the
government-sponsored entities that hold $1.5 trillion of home loans and
mortgage securities. Critics say they’re so heavily leveraged that
a big jump in interest rates would force taxpayers to bail them out.
Key lawmakers have other priorities. They’re sold on arguments
that a regulatory crackdown would pull the plug on the housing boom.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruling on eminent
domain won’t hold much sway.
Congress is moving to take the sting out of the recent decision, which
says localities can take private property for economic development. Lawmakers
will bar the federal government from seizing private land for development
and prohibit the use of federal funds for such projects.
And many states are planning similar
steps on their own.
As the president mulls a successor
to Justice O’Connor ...
Businesses are casting a watchful
eye. O’Connor was a friend. She
opposed punitive damage awards, voted for limited business liability,
took a narrow view on disability suits, and was against contract quotas.
It’s unlikely any new justice could be a more reliable ally of
business.
© 2005 The Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.
![](../../../commonart/spacer.gif)
|